Registered agreements
Every sharing agreement is registered with its conditions, participants and timestamps.
Data sovereignty does not disappear when you share. It is operationalised through formal policies, verified identity and a complete record of every access and agreement.
Sovereignty is not isolation. It is the ability to define, control and audit how your data is used, including outside your organisation.
The Data Owner retains control over which asset is shared, with whom and under what conditions, at all times.
Sharing is not based on implicit trust but on formal agreements with explicit and auditable conditions.
The data owner can see who consumed it, when, for what purpose and for how long.
Access can be revoked at any time if conditions change or the agreed policy is breached.
A usage policy is not a legal contract in itself. It is the formal, executable expression of the conditions under which an asset may be consumed.
For what the asset may be used. Only for the declared and agreed purposes.
Who can access. Validated identity, verified organisation, declared role.
For how long the access is valid. With an explicit expiry date.
What cannot be done with the data: redistribution, re-identification, unauthorised commercial use.
What minimum quality level the publisher guarantees and what happens if it is not met.
The identity of participants is the foundation of the trust model. Data is not shared with unverified parties.
Each participant identifies themselves with verifiable credentials in the trust ecosystem, not ad hoc technical credentials.
The trust relationship between participants is established formally before any sharing.
Not only the organisation's identity is verified but also the declared role and capacity of the consumer.
It is operationalized.
The evidence record is what turns declared sovereignty into real, auditable sovereignty.
Every sharing agreement is registered with its conditions, participants and timestamps.
Every effective access is recorded: who, when, which version and under which policy.
The record is auditable by the data owner, the consumer and compliance bodies.
If an access outside the agreed conditions is detected, the system generates alerts and can revoke access.
Data sovereignty is complementary to technical security and regulatory compliance, not an alternative.
Assets with personal data carry specific policies that ensure GDPR compliance in sharing.
Only assets with the appropriate security classification for external use may be shared.
The DATUM core is never exposed. Only the certified and published asset is externally accessible.
The evidence record is part of the corporate audit model, not a separate system.
Data sovereignty does not disappear; it is operationalised.
dsg.soberania.related.lead